On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 11:47:10AM -0700, William Balcerski wrote: > I would propose having all patches go to the same list for both CVS and > darcs, maybe rename netrek-CVS to netrek-patches. Keep netrek-dev low > traffic, for design issues or approval of potentinally controversial > patches only. And redefine the currently unused netrek mailing list as > for players, clue game announcements, etc. Change mailman.us.netrek.org > to reflect that, and advertise on rgn and server MOTDs. I think we set up netrek at us.netrek.org specifically to replace all the various user/player lists. It's just that most people don't seem to be using that list. I wouldn't mind seeing the darcs patches go to netrek-cvs, but James has a good point about keeping developers in the loop on netrek-dev. There is always the digest subscription mode. On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 08:20:10AM +1000, James Cameron wrote: > > I'd like to do so, yes. It keeps developers in the loop. I expect all > developers to review the patches. I think we are getting code reviews > faster than if we'd posted to the netrek-cvs list, whose membership is > unknown to me. I'd like a netrek-announce list for anyone who can't > afford the cost of seeing the patches on netrek-dev, but perhaps the > bare netrek list is sufficient. I do think the base netrek@ list is sufficient and a netrek-announce is unnecessary; the netrek-announce we had on SF never got used.