On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 05:56:21PM +0200, Rado S wrote:
> Uh ... "all of netrek" ... maybe I miss something or misunderstand
> you, but aren't the respective client maintainers reponsible for
> _their_ babies add newbie improvements?

There's no reason why that should be so.

With all source in change control, with the languages in use being
typical, and with active developers for each client (or server), they
should be able to take patches from a single developer (you)
implementing a feature that has common appeal.

That's how I did it with the metaserver solicitation changes ... issuing
patches for Vanilla, INL, and Paradise servers.

If you strike a barrier to your patch acceptance, then you have to work
with all concerned developers until the problem is resolved.

James Cameron    mailto:quozl at us.netrek.org     http://quozl.netrek.org/