From quozl at us.netrek.org Tue Sep 1 07:59:21 2009 From: quozl at us.netrek.org (James Cameron) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 22:59:21 +1000 Subject: [netrek-dev] netrek-server-vanilla-2.16.0 released Message-ID: <20090901125921.GA10098@us.netrek.org> netrek-server-vanilla 2.16.0 was released. http://quozl.linux.org.au/netrek/ 2434a02b5e01646c7fc55bc1185ea3c5 netrek-server-vanilla-2.16.0.tar.gz Also available on http://quozl.us.netrek.org/netrek/ http://netrek.org/files/Vanilla/ LTD_STATS is now default. If you are upgrading from 2.15.0, be sure to keep LTD_STATS in include/config.h defined as before, otherwise your player database will become inaccessible. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://mailman.us.netrek.org/pipermail/netrek-dev/attachments/20090901/b689aa75/attachment.pgp From basic at us.netrek.org Tue Sep 1 14:58:30 2009 From: basic at us.netrek.org (Bob Tanner) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 14:58:30 -0500 Subject: [netrek-dev] netrek-server-vanilla-2.16.0 released References: <20090901125921.GA10098@us.netrek.org> Message-ID: On 2009-09-01 07:59:21 -0500, James Cameron said: > netrek-server-vanilla 2.16.0 was released. The cmake build stuff not get included in the 2.16.0 release? -- Bob Tanner Key fingerprint = F785 DDFC CF94 7CE8 AA87 3A9D 3895 26F1 0DDB E378 From quozl at us.netrek.org Tue Sep 1 17:21:25 2009 From: quozl at us.netrek.org (James Cameron) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 08:21:25 +1000 Subject: [netrek-dev] netrek-server-vanilla-2.16.0 released In-Reply-To: References: <20090901125921.GA10098@us.netrek.org> Message-ID: <20090901222125.GL9665@us.netrek.org> On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 02:58:30PM -0500, Bob Tanner wrote: > On 2009-09-01 07:59:21 -0500, James Cameron > said: > > > netrek-server-vanilla 2.16.0 was released. > > The cmake build stuff not get included in the 2.16.0 release? Let's spin a 2.16.1 ... you're right, most of the files you added to darcs for cmake build weren't added to the manifest file, the only ones visible are: netrek-server-vanilla-2.16.0/robots/commands.c.cmake netrek-server-vanilla-2.16.0/sequencer/commands.c.cmake I don't know which files are needed. I don't know how to build using cmake yet. tests/build in the repository still uses autotools. Can you tell me which of the files need to be added? Is it just the cmake/ directory? -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ From basic at us.netrek.org Wed Sep 2 12:51:12 2009 From: basic at us.netrek.org (Bob Tanner) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 12:51:12 -0500 Subject: [netrek-dev] Bug #276631 References: <20090831063644.GD11343@us.netrek.org> Message-ID: On 2009-08-31 12:12:48 -0500, Bob Tanner said: > >> Is there some file that describes how to use >> cmake within the source? > > The code is the documentation? ;-) > > I'll write something up. http://wiki.netrek.org/index.php/Building#CMake_Building and https://answers.launchpad.net/netrek-server/+question/81716 -- Bob Tanner Key fingerprint = F785 DDFC CF94 7CE8 AA87 3A9D 3895 26F1 0DDB E378 From quozl at us.netrek.org Wed Sep 2 19:09:29 2009 From: quozl at us.netrek.org (James Cameron) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 10:09:29 +1000 Subject: [netrek-dev] Bug #276631 In-Reply-To: References: <20090831063644.GD11343@us.netrek.org> Message-ID: <20090903000929.GK7977@us.netrek.org> On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 12:51:12PM -0500, Bob Tanner wrote: > On 2009-08-31 12:12:48 -0500, Bob Tanner > said: > > >> Is there some file that describes how to use > >> cmake within the source? > > > > The code is the documentation? ;-) > > > > I'll write something up. > > http://wiki.netrek.org/index.php/Building#CMake_Building > > and > > https://answers.launchpad.net/netrek-server/+question/81716 I've moved this into the source repository because I think it is critical that the source be self documented when distributed in .tar.gz form. I don't think source documentation should be stored outside the source. I've created two files; 1. INSTALL.cmake which is a narrative of the process, although it is incomplete, and 2. tests/build-cmake which does what tests/build does except it uses cmake. These are both pushed to my public repository. Now, there are several problems that I need assistance with ... a. there is no "make install" target, so one can't complete the task of getting a server built and operational, ... this is critical, b. there is no obvious way to provide a --prefix argument as with the autoconf method, ... this is critical, c. the tests/build-cmake stored in darcs without execute bit needs to be fixed between the time the darcs repository is fetched and the first use is made ... this used to be done by autogen.sh, but if we're deprecating autogen.sh we have to find some other way of restoring execute bits, ... this is trivial and manageable, d. changing one source file and rerunning cmake seems to recompile more than expected, or it is too verbose ... see below for test results ... this is a hindrance but not critical ... it would be less useful in the situation that most server operators use ... which is maintaining a server from a source directory that is a darcs repository or unpacked tarball. On the other hand, there does seem to be a time advantage to cmake. -- Test results, output line count based on normal maintenance tasks. 1. autotools, existing, full build 253 lines, one file changed 67 lines, no files changed 32 lines, 2. CMake, proposed, full build 1234 lines, one file changed 600 lines, no files changed 496 lines. -- Test results, wall clock duration of various build methods. 1. autotools, full build, 55 seconds, 2. CMake, full build, 34 seconds, 3. autotools, rebuild of one file, 2.5 seconds, 4. CMake, rebuild of one file, 4 seconds. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ From basic at us.netrek.org Thu Sep 3 00:49:13 2009 From: basic at us.netrek.org (Bob Tanner) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 00:49:13 -0500 Subject: [netrek-dev] Bug #276631 References: <20090831063644.GD11343@us.netrek.org> <20090903000929.GK7977@us.netrek.org> Message-ID: On 2009-09-02 19:09:29 -0500, James Cameron said: > I've moved this into the source repository because I think it is > critical that the source be self documented when distributed in .tar.gz > form. I don't think source documentation should be stored outside the > source. I put that info on the web for review and edit. I planned to put in source after review. Did not mean to dump it on you. Your listed points below, I'll address the ones I can. Probably in seperate post(s). -- Bob Tanner Key fingerprint = F785 DDFC CF94 7CE8 AA87 3A9D 3895 26F1 0DDB E378 From basic at us.netrek.org Thu Sep 3 02:26:09 2009 From: basic at us.netrek.org (Bob Tanner) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 02:26:09 -0500 Subject: [netrek-dev] Bug #276631 References: <20090831063644.GD11343@us.netrek.org> <20090903000929.GK7977@us.netrek.org> Message-ID: On 2009-09-03 00:49:13 -0500, Bob Tanner said: > Your listed points below, I'll address the ones I can. Probably in > seperate post(s). Opened several bugs. This url will list all cmake related issues: https://bugs.launchpad.net/netrek-server/+bugs?field.tag=cmake I'll begin working on them tomorrow. -- Bob Tanner Key fingerprint = F785 DDFC CF94 7CE8 AA87 3A9D 3895 26F1 0DDB E378 From chris.lukassen at gmail.com Fri Sep 4 15:43:19 2009 From: chris.lukassen at gmail.com (Chris Lukassen) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 22:43:19 +0200 Subject: [netrek-dev] MacTrek 1.5RC1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: >> >>> I've seen this issue when things are compiled on leopard (10.5) >>> and run >>> on tiger (10.4). >> >> Cool. What's the fix? > > Build it for 10.4 Intel, meaning adding the 10.4 SDK to the Xcode > project and recompile. will do > > Apple needs to to allow VMWare to virtualize osx under Fusion so I can > have still build older releases! > found an eh "backup" copy of tiger on the web for fusion, will try to install it and run it. >> > Double checked. Cannot build 10.4 binaries under snow lepoard. > At some point we will need to let go of PPC and 10.4 but if we can keep it in for this release, it would increase the player base (hopefully) Will gear up my old cube and see if it runs the RC cheers C -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.us.netrek.org/pipermail/netrek-dev/attachments/20090904/5f05f3df/attachment.htm From basic at us.netrek.org Sun Sep 6 16:30:45 2009 From: basic at us.netrek.org (Bob Tanner) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 16:30:45 -0500 Subject: [netrek-dev] MacTrek 1.5RC1 References: <20090830230315.GA9940@us.netrek.org> <20090831061731.GC11343@us.netrek.org> Message-ID: On 2009-08-31 20:38:50 -0500, Bob Tanner said: > >> I'll have double check when I get home, I do not think you even have >> the option for 10.4 SDK under snow leopard. > > Double checked. Cannot build 10.4 binaries under snow lepoard. On the official dvd, under Optional Installs, there is a 10.4 SDK install. I double checked, this is -not- available for download. -- Bob Tanner Key fingerprint = F785 DDFC CF94 7CE8 AA87 3A9D 3895 26F1 0DDB E378