The problem with WebRTC is that is not fully supported on all, notably on Apple devices through Safari. > On May 16, 2015, at 1:18 PM, Andrew Sillers <apsillers at gmail.com> wrote: > WebRTC support would be a great addition. WebRTC could be used alongside a Websocket connection, just like UDP is used alongside TCP in the current clients (since those are the underlying WebRTC and WS transport protocols). > > For a mobile Phonegap app, we can just use native TCP and UDP plugins without needing to use the Web-specific wrappers. > >> On May 16, 2015 6:52 AM, "Sven Neuhaus" <sven-netrek-dev at sven.de> wrote: >> Am 14.05.15 um 17:40 schrieb Andrew Sillers: >> > I completely agree. There was some (very brief) discussion about >> > Websocket server support when I was originally working on the client. >> >> Instead of using Websocket, nowadays using a WebRTC data connection in >> the browser is probably preferable. WebRTC uses UDP and should provide >> better latency. >> >> -Sven >> >> _______________________________________________ >> netrek-dev mailing list >> netrek-dev at us.netrek.org >> http://mailman.us.netrek.org/mailman/listinfo/netrek-dev > _______________________________________________ > netrek-dev mailing list > netrek-dev at us.netrek.org > http://mailman.us.netrek.org/mailman/listinfo/netrek-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mailman.us.netrek.org/pipermail/netrek-dev/attachments/20150517/867ad553/attachment.html>