<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Niclas Fredriksson wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:Pine.GSO.4.64.0804061247230.2784@shaka.acc.umu.se"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Sat, 5 Apr 2008, Mark Mielke wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">It is a team sport, though, and having separate plays isolated from each
other is a bit anti-team.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
This comment of yours is a comment on netrek, not the audio part. It's a
fact that there are several separate plays going on continuously in
netrek.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
No - I don't think so. Team messages have been fine for tracking team
efforts for over a decade. Voice is more efficient. There is really no
reason it NEEDS to have separate channels. Some people might not be
able to figure out the new protocols, just like some people never used
team messages appropriately.<br>
<br>
If you isolate voice - you end up with people NOT getting important
team messages. If the team captain says something important, and isn't
heard, because you are off doing your own thing on a separate channel -
whose fault is that?<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
mark<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Mark Mielke <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:mark@mielke.cc"><mark@mielke.cc></a>
</pre>
</body>
</html>