On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 07:40:07PM -0500, Bob Tanner wrote: > Quoting Tom Holub (doosh at best.com): > > mutt is also a mail program perfectly capable of dealing with HTML mail > > in a reasonable manner. > > I disagree, Steve's post, yes lynx could easily render his email to be readable, > but many html post are difficult to read because of all the non-text elements. > > We all know your stance, your monthly posts of html to the usenet shows your > preference. I use mutt 100% of the time (and trn 100% of the time for news, for that matter). I also happen to receive HTML e-mail all the time. I have yet to receive an HTML e-mail that mutt didn't render just fine--in many cases I don't even notice that an HTML conversion is going on. In case you need help, in your .mailcap: text/html; lynx -dump %s; copiousoutput; nametemplate=%s.html And in the .muttrc: auto_view text/html (Or perhaps you prefer complaining). -Tom