On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 05:24:45PM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > As it concerns only the config utility, i used gum.xpm found in the tarball. > However, once reduced to 32x32 pixels, it's not really readable :-) I agree, it needs another one. We don't have one chosen. Have you any ideas? > However, everything is compiled thereafter without any optimisation flag: > gcc -g -I../ntserv -DRSA -I.. -c -o cluecheck.o cluecheck.c Shows our Makefile are dumb. If you can fix them, we will fix our CVS. > Finaly, i'm a bit confused about the config utility name. It seems to be gum, > so why symlink it as netrekcfg, and ships it in a config package ? Nobody understood why it was called gum, so we made an alias. Hardly anybody who knows how to run a Netrek server wants a GUI to do it, so it is optional in a config package. If you think it should be in the main package, then move it there. -- James Cameron mailto:quozl at us.netrek.org http://quozl.netrek.org/