On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 05:24:45PM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> As it concerns only the config utility, i used gum.xpm found in the tarball. 
> However, once reduced to 32x32 pixels, it's not really readable :-)

I agree, it needs another one.
We don't have one chosen.  Have you any ideas?

> However, everything is compiled thereafter without any optimisation flag:
> gcc -g  -I../ntserv -DRSA    -I..    -c -o cluecheck.o cluecheck.c

Shows our Makefile are dumb.
If you can fix them, we will fix our CVS.

> Finaly, i'm a bit confused about the config utility name. It seems to be gum, 
> so why symlink it as netrekcfg, and ships it in a config package ?

Nobody understood why it was called gum, so we made an alias.  Hardly
anybody who knows how to run a Netrek server wants a GUI to do it, so it
is optional in a config package.  If you think it should be in the main
package, then move it there.

James Cameron    mailto:quozl at us.netrek.org     http://quozl.netrek.org/