Ainsi parlait James Cameron : > On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 05:24:45PM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > > As it concerns only the config utility, i used gum.xpm found in the > > tarball. However, once reduced to 32x32 pixels, it's not really readable > > :-) > > I agree, it needs another one. > We don't have one chosen. Have you any ideas? Maybe the original author could reproduce it and keep only the netrek logo ? I need it into 48x48, 32x32 and 16x16 format. Just send me the largest one. > > However, everything is compiled thereafter without any optimisation flag: > > gcc -g -I../ntserv -DRSA -I.. -c -o cluecheck.o cluecheck.c > > Shows our Makefile are dumb. > If you can fix them, we will fix our CVS. Arghh ! I'm a packager, not an autoconf/automake pro :-( I'll try to have a look, but don't count too much on me for this. > > Finaly, i'm a bit confused about the config utility name. It seems to be > > gum, so why symlink it as netrekcfg, and ships it in a config package ? > > Nobody understood why it was called gum, so we made an alias. Hardly > anybody who knows how to run a Netrek server wants a GUI to do it, so it > is optional in a config package. If you think it should be in the main > package, then move it there. No, an additional package is ok. Just have to find which name to use :-) -- Guillaume Rousse <rousse at ccr.jussieu.fr> GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html