My code part is very simple and I beleive it is similar for other open source clients: do whatever you want, don't relicense under GPL or LGPL. If they want to put binaries on disk-on-key and distribute it among their customers it is ok with me. Stas. On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, E. Hietbrink wrote: > Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 01:49:19 +0200 > From: E. Hietbrink <Shadow.Hunter at netrek.org> > To: Joe Evango <joe at playnetrek.org>, Stas Pirogov <keyos at keyos.org>, > Dave Ahn <ahn at orion.netrek.org>, "Sven Neuhaus (Courier)" <sven at ping.de>, > vanilla-devel at us.netrek.org, vanilla-clients at us.netrek.org > Cc: Joe Evango <jjadeinc at hotmail.com> > Subject: [Fwd: Re: Netrek licensing information] > > Ok, I'm a bit confused. I have no clue what this guys intent is, > but since he has responded he seems sincere. What to do? I have no clue > on whether he plans on making money off it for instance. I lack details, > and would like to know how to proceed. > > Advise please. asap. > > Greetx, Erik > -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Alexander.Prather at ogilvy.com Subject: Re: Netrek licensing information Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 17:40:34 -0400 Size: 6067 Url: http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/netrek-dev/attachments/20040423/ef5a9374/Netreklicensinginformation.mht -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ vanilla-clients mailing list vanilla-clients at us.netrek.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/vanilla-clients