Folks, Please add me to the repo access list. My concerns are that I want to develop and put some updates for Java, Cygwin Server. My web client initiatives will also include Macromedia flash clients, and 3D gl4java stuff. I was also thinking bout a mod_netrek extension for apache so folks could play via HTTP to avoid the firewall issues. These may introduce different file extension types. Although I haven't had time recently, I wanted to do use some 3d rendering tools like 3dsmax to help us put together cool 3d netrek clients. Anyway you havent seen anything from me 'xcept vapor ware, but I have been super busy of late, and unless I croak first, I will still be thinking about hobby improving netreks client side for the web. -bd ----- Original Message ----- From: Bob Tanner <tanner at real-time.com> To: zSubject: Re: [Vanilla Devel] My complaints regarding cvs and proposed solution(non-arch users) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:13:40 -0500 > > On Wednesday 27 October 2004 12:18 pm, Colin Jensen wrote: > > Subversion plans on enhancements for stuff like distributed development > > with private repositories (and pretty much all the other complaints listed > > in dwheeler's essay). But it does not have it now. Since distributed > > development seems to be one of the Big Deals Bob is looking for, we need to > > use something other than Subversion. > > My primary concern is security, pgp-signed repositories (archives) and > pgp-signed changesets (commits). The distributed nature of arch isn't really > an issue, since I think we will still do a central development model > regardless of the revision control tool used. -- ___________________________________________________________ Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm _______________________________________________ vanilla-devel mailing list vanilla-devel at us.netrek.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/vanilla-devel