On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 11:27:53AM -0500, Bob Tanner wrote: > > All of gnu.org was down for awhile, not sure what was going on. But the arch > wiki was still accessible: > > http://wiki.gnuarch.org/ > > For your reading pleasure(?) > > Discussion of Arch and Subversion > http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/scm.html Thanks. Actually, I now vaguely remember reading about Arch a while back. Anyway, the proposal to move away from CVS was due mainly to security and maintenance issues and not any real dissatisfaction with CVS's functionality. While Arch appears to have some nice features superior to SV, the ability to import (and preserve) a CVS repository into SV is a big plus. Plus, the main benefit of Arch (decentralized repo) isn't that useful to us anyway considering that we have a very small development group. I would still prefer SV over Arch, but I don't feel that strongly about it, so whatever you want to do is fine with me. Dave _______________________________________________ vanilla-devel mailing list vanilla-devel at us.netrek.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/vanilla-devel