On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, William Balcerski wrote: > > I've pushed this to the 'shiny' repo, but I'd like confirmation from > > someone else that the shipsize change should be removed before I push > > it to netrek.org. Why was it there? > > > Up until recently, AT size was defined as 28 by 28 for whatever reason > (probably because clients didn't come with AT bitmaps, so the mismatch > ship size/shield overlay made the CA bitmap function as AT). I changed > this in a patch last month called ATT fixes, to 20 by 20, which is normal > ship size. Thus, the lines changing ship size to 20 by 20 in xtkill were > unnecessary. The original ATT bitmap, the one from the paradise client, is larger than a normal ship.