On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, William Balcerski wrote:
> > I've pushed this to the 'shiny' repo, but I'd like confirmation from
> > someone else that the shipsize change should be removed before I push
> > it to netrek.org. Why was it there?
> >
> Up until recently, AT size was defined as 28 by 28 for whatever reason
> (probably because clients didn't come with AT bitmaps, so the mismatch
> ship size/shield overlay made the CA bitmap function as AT).  I changed
> this in a patch last month called ATT fixes, to 20 by 20, which is normal
> ship size.  Thus, the lines changing ship size to 20 by 20 in xtkill were
> unnecessary.

The original ATT bitmap, the one from the paradise client, is larger than a
normal ship.