On 11/12/06, James Cameron <quozl at us.netrek.org> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 11:42:45PM -0800, William Balcerski wrote: > > If it is true that they aren't listed, what is the logic? Shouldn't the > > users have the choice of all active servers? > > Agreed, they should have the choice of all active servers. Let them go > where the players are. If the players want features we aren't > implementing on a particular server, then off they will go. It's a bit tautological but the players go where the players are! And that means wherever there is a server running pre-T bots. The vast majority of players I spoken to who are still atively playing are newbies who logon wherever they see a game and some oldbies but don't play much but will logon wherever there is a game. They are not playing on sturgeon because of perceived superior richness of funtionality but rather just because that is where the games are. This hypothesis can be easily tested. Run bots that show 8 players logged into continuum on the metaserver at all times and you will see a direct correlation between decline of games at sturgeon and rise in games at bronco I assert :-) But seriously please run pre-T bots on continuum so we can get bronco off of life support! 2 months now with no bronco pickup is long enough I say. Zach