On 4/2/07, ChronosWS <chronosws at comcast.net> wrote:
> Speaking of the network protocol, has there been any discussion of tuning it
> up and throwing away compatibility with older servers?  Much of the existing
> protocol assumes C-style block serialization, fixed field sizes and the
> like.  These restrictions and design choices are not necessarily required
> any more.  Also, what about altering the update interval such that it is
> dynamic based on events, rather than based on strict time base?  Should a
> separate thread be spawned to discuss these or are those decisions already
> made?

Howdy Cliff,

Good idea.