On 4/24/07, Trent Piepho <xyzzy at speakeasy.org> wrote: > > It is probably glibc compatibility problems. glibc doesn't support static > linking, and I've had to go to great trouble to produce a static binary. I have libc5 and libc6 is there a way I can tell one of the dynamically linked executables to use one of those instead of glibc? Static linking is not that unusual so why wouldn't glibc support i I wonder? Zach