going on about nobody caring the side is the sound of somebody about to give up all you need to do is advertise and gamers and star-trek fans will be pouring in :) >From: Stas Pirogov <keyos at keyos.org> >Reply-To: Netrek Development Mailing List <netrek-dev at us.netrek.org> >To: Netrek Development Mailing List <netrek-dev at us.netrek.org> >Subject: Re: [netrek-dev] Blessed binaries release procedure (CF without >SF) >Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:46:39 +0200 (IST) > >Rado, I'm sorry to sound a bit harsh, but I think nobody >these days cares that much about netrek. Nobody >will setup anything to compile/manage/distribute netrek >clients. > >We all (at least most of us) are grown people that at >some point were crazy about the game and were willing >to spend indefinite amounts of time to make the game >better (each one in his own way). We aren't that crazy >anymore :) > >I beleive that no person in this list (correct me if I'm wrong) >is willing to spend time to do tasks that you're willing us to. > >I guess James/Carlos/Trent are people that will still have >last word in regards of what's right and wrong in current >netrek community. However they don't spend that much time >in the netrek universe any more. It's just the life, nothing >to do with that. > >Great open source projects wouldn't be that great if there >wouldn't exist constant wave of new developers that come >and take charge. Same goes here. > >I hope I didn't offend anyone and I'm sorry if I did. >This is only my opinion and as good old saying states: >"When two jews argue there are three different opinions" :) > >Stas. > >On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Rado S wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:16:30 +0200 > > From: Rado S <regrado at web.de> > > Reply-To: Netrek Development Mailing List <netrek-dev at us.netrek.org> > > To: netrek-dev at us.netrek.org > > Subject: Re: [netrek-dev] Blessed binaries release procedure (CF without >SF) > > > > =- James Quick wrote on Thu 29.Mar'07 at 10:19:44 +1000 -= > > > > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 10:45:03PM +0200, Rado S wrote: > > > > I've heard SF has a compile farm, which I believed to be a system > > > > where one could compile on (almost) all platforms to provide > > > > binaries. > > > > > > True. > > > > > > > How do you like that? > > > > > > Good, please set it up, let us know how you go. > > > > Heh, the question didn't apply just to the technical compile farm > > aspect, but also to the source- binary separation/ new key > > management roles. Does your answer apply to this, too? > > > > > > Given that SF's compile farm is unusable for the time being, has > > anyone else the resources to run (or already runs) virtual > > platforms so that could be implemented without SF? > > > > I'm sorry for being lame to ask for somebody else to provide > > service rather than offering myself, but I simply don't have > > the resources, neither hard- nor soft- ware. > > I'm also no "legal" RSA- key-/ binaries manager candidate because > > I'm no USA/Canada citizen. > > Or has the export limitation been lifted and I missed it? > > > > -- > > © Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal! > > EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude. > > You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > netrek-dev mailing list > > netrek-dev at us.netrek.org > > http://mailman.us.netrek.org/mailman/listinfo/netrek-dev > > > > >_______________________________________________ >netrek-dev mailing list >netrek-dev at us.netrek.org >http://mailman.us.netrek.org/mailman/listinfo/netrek-dev _________________________________________________________________ Txt a lot? Get Messenger FREE on your mobile. https://livemessenger.mobile.uk.msn.com/