Looks like a good start. Before I do more editing, could someone fix the issue with links and footnotes? They all seem broken. Or at least point me to an example of how we want the wiki to handle pages with links and footnotes, so I can fix the rest manually if needed. Bill On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 7:35 AM, James Cameron <quozl at us.netrek.org> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 05:55:50AM -0400, Andrew K. Bressen wrote: >> I have now ported most of the content of the old wiki and updated some of it. >> Some of the formatting is broken due to differences in wiki software; >> feel free to fix. > > Excellent, well done. I've begun to fix pages that I had held up > changing on the old Wiki. I've added several pages to my watchlist, and > added the Recent Changes RSS feed to my feed reader. > > -- > James Cameron mailto:quozl at us.netrek.org http://quozl.netrek.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > netrek-dev mailing list > netrek-dev at us.netrek.org > http://mailman.us.netrek.org/mailman/listinfo/netrek-dev >