On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 05:30:59PM -0500, Zachary Uram wrote:
> It was not naive, just incomplete based on my understanding at
> the time.

As Jeffrey points out, you can't be both not naive and not understanding
at the time.

> Sounds like this serious coding error should be fixed forthwith.

Yeah, I feel like doing it, but why should it be fixed?  Does it really
exist?  Have you even noticed it?

James Cameron