On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 05:30:59PM -0500, Zachary Uram wrote: > It was not naive, just incomplete based on my understanding at > the time. As Jeffrey points out, you can't be both not naive and not understanding at the time. > Sounds like this serious coding error should be fixed forthwith. Yeah, I feel like doing it, but why should it be fixed? Does it really exist? Have you even noticed it? -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/