On Monday 25 October 2004 10:34 am, Dave Ahn wrote: > I don't have any issues with dropping CVS. However, I haven't heard > much about arch...not surprising given that the project seems relatively > new (according to Savannah project summary -- the GNU arch home page > seems to be down; not a good sign). I haven't looked at BK's license, > but I do recall subversion having an Apache style license. I'd be more > enthusiastic about using subversion than arch, personally. All of gnu.org was down for awhile, not sure what was going on. But the arch wiki was still accessible: http://wiki.gnuarch.org/ For your reading pleasure(?) Discussion of Arch and Subversion http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/scm.html -- Bob Tanner <tanner at mn-linux.org> | Phone : (952)943-8700 http://www.mn-linux.org, Minnesota, Linux | Fax : (952)943-8500 Key fingerprint = AB15 0BDF BCDE 4369 5B42 1973 7CF1 A709 2CC1 B288 _______________________________________________ vanilla-devel mailing list vanilla-devel at us.netrek.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/vanilla-devel