On Monday 25 October 2004 10:34 am, Dave Ahn wrote:
> I don't have any issues with dropping CVS.  However, I haven't heard
> much about arch...not surprising given that the project seems relatively
> new (according to Savannah project summary -- the GNU arch home page
> seems to be down; not a good sign).  I haven't looked at BK's license,
> but I do recall subversion having an Apache style license.  I'd be more
> enthusiastic about using subversion than arch, personally.

All of gnu.org was down for awhile, not sure what was going on. But the arch 
wiki was still accessible:


For your reading pleasure(?)

 Discussion of Arch and Subversion
Bob Tanner <tanner at mn-linux.org>          | Phone : (952)943-8700
http://www.mn-linux.org, Minnesota, Linux | Fax   : (952)943-8500
Key fingerprint = AB15 0BDF BCDE 4369 5B42  1973 7CF1 A709 2CC1 B288

vanilla-devel mailing list
vanilla-devel at us.netrek.org