On Wednesday 27 October 2004 12:18 pm, Colin Jensen wrote:
> Subversion plans on enhancements for stuff like distributed development
> with private repositories (and pretty much all the other complaints listed
> in dwheeler's essay).  But it does not have it now.  Since distributed
> development seems to be one of the Big Deals Bob is looking for, we need to
> use something other than Subversion.

My primary concern is security, pgp-signed repositories (archives) and 
pgp-signed changesets (commits). The distributed nature of arch isn't really 
an issue, since I think we will still do a central development model 
regardless of the revision control tool used.
Bob Tanner <tanner at mn-linux.org>          | Phone : (952)943-8700
http://www.mn-linux.org, Minnesota, Linux | Fax   : (952)943-8500
Key fingerprint = AB15 0BDF BCDE 4369 5B42  1973 7CF1 A709 2CC1 B288

vanilla-devel mailing list
vanilla-devel at us.netrek.org