=- Joe Evango wrote on Mon 20.Aug'07 at 15:11:06 -0500 -= > identifying certain areas of responsibility, Right. > replacing people who have volunteered their time and made numerous > contributions to Netrek for many years and restructuring the > Netrek community. When they don't want to volunteer for this ... > The ideas you presented several months ago for restructuring would > require a tremendous amount of community support which I do not > sense there is. ... I still wonder why you all are so upset, when they themselves aren't. It's not like I wanted to take anything away from them but built on top of their groundwork things, which they weren't interested in to do themselves. > I believe a majority of the people you asked for responses from > have responded. 3 of 5: 1 apparently totally out of netrek business, 1 uncaring. 2 of 3 (total 5) useful responses, so 2 win:2 loss:1 draw. I'd rather call it balanced, not majority. > They may not have given the answers you wanted but they did > respond. All 3 have, although the 3rd one's weren't as useful. > Were there additional pieces that I missed? Yes, to explain what keywords or means you use on 3rd party sites as baits for newbs when they search for games to stick with netrek. -- © Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal! EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude. You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.