>From: Rado S <regrado at web.de> > >Why shouldn't I have? >Being part of the public (and everyone else who once in a while barks >"borg" adds to this public demand), it's the authority of the public >when the powers in charge don't (want to) respond to public requests. > Were you requesting or demanding? What are you not receiving responses on? Seems like most everyone you asked for replies from have given them, some several times. > >What's bad about replacing those "in charge" when they can't or >don't want to implement the supposedly demanded fairness? > Notice you used the word "demanded" instead of "requested". Fairness in regards to what? Paradise? This has already been answered. > >You can't know before you ask and then try. >And asking for support (active or passive) was all I did. > I didn't get the feeling you were asking. Seemed more like an ultimatum. > >But ... about what? >I laid down the concept, asked for volunteers among the owners, then >permission to go without them but with their infrastructure, or >straight opposition. Should every action be delayed forever >when required responses "hang" forever? There is always some >"timeout" to get moving (and kill a process when it blocks access). > What's confusing about that? > For one I am confused about what exactly your role is in the community. Outside of the dev list and #netrek I have never seen you on a server nor has anyone else I have spoken with. How can someone restructure a gaming community if they are disconnected from the game and never play? What action and what process? -Joe _________________________________________________________________ Now you can see trouble…before he arrives http://newlivehotmail.com/?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_viral_protection_0507