On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 03:47:36PM +0100, Rado S wrote:
> =- James Cameron wrote on Sun 24.Feb'08 at 22:15:21 +1100 -=
> > > > From Paradise 2000 README:
> > > 
> > > Please, can we focus on replacing that with a more useful
> > > standard P-client rather than using this as a reference for
> > > anything? Avoid any reference to it in the future, thank you.
> > 
> > While the key is present and people use it, I think we need to
> > continue to refer to it as necessary.
> But the presence is questioned, not just by me, but some netrek
> authority, too. Maybe the whole issue could be solved faster if the
> presence issue were solved first.

I agree.

> > Nothing has changed in the situation, except a few people have
> > made patches and some others have noticed them.
> Sometimes this is enough to cross the critical threshold.

It was for you, yes.

> > If you can out-do the current key maintainer and convince all
> > server operators to follow your key list, go ahead. I don't see
> > that as likely. Carlos at least has our trust.
> I never asked for takeover and following _my_ leadership.
> I just asked for _some_ _more_ active leadership.
> But nobody felt like doing it nor following anyone else even if he/
> they stood up to serve.
> So netrek as a whole has the mess it deserves.

It is fascinating how you presume there should be community and
leadership.  Good luck.

James Cameron    mailto:quozl at us.netrek.org     http://quozl.netrek.org/